A field guide to being wrong
The Error Atlas
66 recurring reasoning mistakes. For each one: what it looks like, why it feels right, how to catch it, and the physics that fixes it. Your diagnostic report links straight here.
▣ Featured entries
illustrated · high-recurrence
Constant speed is not zero acceleration
detect · You set a = 0 for something moving in a curved path at steady speed.
Static friction is not always at its maximum
detect · You wrote f = μs·N for a body that isn't on the verge of slipping.
Centripetal acceleration points inward
detect · Your free-body diagram has a net outward arrow for something moving in a circle.
≡ Full index
63 of 66 entries
Research basis
Where the taxonomy comes from.
The Atlas follows the physics-education-research tradition of treating a wrong answer as evidence of a specific alternative model, not carelessness. Several categories map to documented results:
- The phantom “force of motion” (NL-01) and impetus-style reasoningClement, Am. J. Phys. 50 (1982) · Halloun & Hestenes, Am. J. Phys. 53 (1985) · McCloskey, Scientific American 248 (1983)
- Velocity / acceleration confusion (the force–acceleration category)Trowbridge & McDermott, Am. J. Phys. 48 (1980) & 49 (1981)
- Distractors authored to detect specific misconceptions — the instrument design this diagnostic imitatesHestenes, Wells & Swackhamer, “Force Concept Inventory,” The Physics Teacher 30 (1992)
- Novices sorting problems by surface features instead of governing principles — why the ladder re-tests one principle in changing costumesChi, Feltovich & Glaser, Cognitive Science 5 (1981)
The entries, codes, and problems here are original. The method — coded distractors, named misconceptions, targeted repair — stands on this literature.